Horse Racing Injuries and Horse Slaughter - Prevention Through Breeding Control

I have been aware of horse slaughter since I was aor unproven Thoroughbred stallion for as little as $300.
kid. It was a well known fact Thoroughbred ex-raceBoom! For less than a beater car, you too can own
horses that came through the barn had one shot tothe next derby champ!
make it in the hunter/jumper ring (as riding horses). If aWrong.
horse didn't stay at the barn, we knew the horseOf course, many Thoroughbreds going for meat are
would end up back at dealers, and dealer returnsactually well bred, expensive horses. Some may have
meant the horse was going to slaughter.stud fees of $500,000 or more. By and large,
As a child, horse slaughter was simply a fact. Now, it'sracehorses don't retire to green pasture if they don't
almost a necessity. I don't agree with slaughteringwin. They mostly go to auction. Even when trainers try
horses, nor do I want any horse to end up at atheir best to find a new owner and a new job for the
slaughterhouse, but our society produces far too manyhorse, Thoroughbreds off-the-track are not just for
unwanted horses.anyone. Most of them need experienced handlers and
I receive emails on a weekly basis from severaltrainers.
different horse industry and horse welfare newsWith the 2008 Kentucky Derby ready to hit the
streams. Every time I read one of these legislativestarting gate on May 3rd, what is the average
"updates", I wonder: When is horse slaughter legislationAmerican going to see of the racing industry? Horses
going to start with the cause of unwanted horses?worth millions of dollars? Shiny, lucky horses cared for
Though anti horse slaughter groups have successfullybetter than most people?
shut down horse slaughterhouses in America, horseI wish happenings at an average American
breeding has only increased. If horses at auction don'tThoroughbred Racetrack were televised. Horses
wind up at slaughter, where are all the "unwanted"running at tracks not called Churchill Downs, Belmont
horses going to go? As with the millions of unwantedPark, or Pimlico don't have the luxury of being
dogs and cats who are euthanased every year, itconsidered anything but expendable or replaceable.
would be nice if we could say unwanted horses areAnd besides, with reality TV all the rage, is there
"humanely destroyed." But, horses are just not thatanything more cut throat [pun intended] than watching
easy to put down. Besides being big, difficult tobroke down horses running in races that are paying
transport, to house, and to feed, horses cost severalout $500 with the losers highly unlike to get another
hundred dollars to put down. For "humane" treatment,chance?
horses need not only feed, water, and vaccinations, butThe large majority of horses who will not see the
also farrier care and often special nutritional, veterinary,glamorous camera lenses pointed at them (beside
and stabling.closed circuit monitoring) are only bred to be good for
When is horse slaughter legislation going to start witha year or two. These "modern" Thoroughbreds, the
the cause of unwanted horses?ones at your average, dirty, shady, tracks, aren't bred
Horses end up at auction if they can't be sold privately,to run the Kentucky Derby; they are bred to MAYBE,
can't be cared for, or are (simply) unwanted. If a horseMAYBE win their owners and investors a couple
owner sends an "unwanted" horse to auction and thethousand dollars. The main purpose of the average
horse doesn't sell, what happens to the horse? If theThoroughbred is to honor the owner with the distinction
previous owner can't or won't care for the horse, whoof owning a racehorse. Thoroughbreds, by their nature,
will?are bred to be hot, a trait which does not to serve
It's the same with the overpopulation of dogs and cats.them well outside of running. They are no longer bred
It's better to have a humane society take anwith long lines, or big strides even. They are bred to run
unwanted pet and euthanize it than have a pet returnand move flat, fast, and that's it. Outside of the few
to a home where it isn't wanted or cannot be caredraces they MIGHT run, Thoroughbred racehorses
for. But again, horses are extremely difficult andserve limited purpose.
expensive to care for. Some say re-homing unwantedInterestingly enough, even Kentucky Derby winners
horses is not a big deal since the total number ofaren't safe from slaughter. With the 2002 slaying of
American horses slaughtered per year "only" equals1986 Kentucky Derby winner Ferdinand at a Japanese
about 1% of the total American horse population.slaughterhouse, the horse racing industry has proven
Based on current horse populations (about 9 million intime and time again it does not even value it's most
the US), 90,000 "homeless" horses is still a lot ofprize assets.
horses. With hay prices up, gas prices up, andThusly, even well bred but only "medium" caliber
affordable land becoming more scarce, most horseracehorses, such as those bought and sold at the
people in any part of the country will tell you; "you can'tKeeneland Auction for an average of $100K, may not
even give 'em away these days."ever win, even at a small racetrack. With the hopes of
Some anti-slaughter activists like to claim horse "kill"cleaning up" at the ghetto tracks, these "Kentucky"
buyers" are outbidding nice families in search of a pet.bred horses still are without value unless the winnings
Really? If a "nice family" is only willing to spend $100,come in early and frequently.
maybe a $150 on a horse, will they be willing to spentThe main purpose today's "modern" Thoroughbred is
another $150 on vaccines once the vet comes out?to honor the owner with the distinction of owning a
What about hoof care every six weeks? Hay, grain,racehorse.
shavings? Proper fencing? Does the nice family haveLuckily, there is a good chance a Kentucky bred
money set aside for emergency transport andThoroughbred horse could posses some very nice
thousands of dollars worth of colic surgery? Kill buyers,athletic attributes that could result in a nice hunter
yes, may be out bidding families (occasionally), but thisjumper, dressage, or eventing home. Still, the original
does not mean the family has means to care for thebreeders, owners, and trainers of racehorses are
long term health of the horse.generally unconcerned with where the horses end up.
To minimize horse slaughter and unwanted horses, weThe racing industry wipes their hands clean of losers
need a better plan.without regard for the welfare of the horses.
Currently, there are no horse slaughterhousesSlaughter, new career, loving home - who cares!
operating in the United States. Despite anti-slaughterWhatever gets them off the training and boarding bill,
group efforts, American horse slaughterhouses haveits fine by the racehorse owner.
been successfully shut down, but now horses are justAs an American horse community, we need to start
sent over the border to Mexico and Canada wherelooking at a way to fund "unwanted" horses that are
the treatment and killing of animals is even lessconsidered "garbage" with either euthanasia, or when
humane than under American standards.applicable, retraining programs. Or more importantly,
In many ways, the U.S. slaughter ban has already hurtlet's limit racehorse breeding to owners and trainers
horse welfare.who only commit their funds to providing for a horse
For reference, American slaughterhouses usedthroughout the duration of its life, regardless of its
retractable pneumatic bolts to render horseswinnings. If the racing community had to fork over
unconscious (in theory) before slitting their throats.money for the lifetime care of its horses, the
However, in Mexico, it's common practice to stabunwanted horse population would dry up.
horses in the back repeatedly until their spinal cord isThe horse industry needs a plan, a good plan, to help
severed.lower unwanted horse numbers. Stopping horse
In many ways, the U.S. horse slaughter ban hasslaughter is only going to be beneficial once we stop
already hurt horse welfare. Now, anti-slaughter groupshaving too many horses. In order to stop horse
are attempting to ban horses exported for slaughterslaughter, the Humane Society of the United States
altogether. Despite the fact this new law could beshould do one of two things:
easily circumvented by horse "kill dealers" simply1.) Provide the shelters and means necessary to
labeling horses transported across the border as "forretrain or humanely euthanize unwanted, unadaptable
riding" instead of "for slaughter", we need to first thinkhorses
about minimizing the unwanted horse population before2.) Take giant steps forward to limit the breeding of all
tackling the issue of horse slaughter.horses, not just racing Thoroughbreds
Lets look at some facts:In addition, the HSUS should go after the racing
- According to the USDA, 45,000 horses went tocommunity for some money to start covering the
slaughter in Mexico in 2007, and another 26,000 wenthumane destruction or lifetime care of the horses it
to Canada (total, 71,000+).produces. Now that the Kentucky Derby is underway,
- According to the Jockey Club, 56,000 Thoroughbredwhy don't some of these trainers, owners, breeders,
mares were bred in 2007.and jockeys making BIG money in horse racing
- According to the Thoroughbred Times, Thoroughbredindustry give some money back, to the horses
race horses averaged 25 starts per life in 1950; bythemselves?
1994, the average Thoroughbred ran just 14 races.If the racing community had to fork over money for
What does this mean? More Thoroughbreds runningthe lifetime care of its horses, the unwanted horse
less races equals more waste. Due to over breedingpopulation would dry up.
of the Thoroughbred, not only does the ThoroughbredLet's stop breeding low quality Thoroughbreds, shut
Times conclude Thoroughbred races horses are lessdown the seedy racetracks, and start a rehab and
sound than 60 years ago , but also, they are less used.retraining humane society that can help with these
Moreover, why have we not had a Triple Crownunwanted horses either through re-homing (realistically),
winner in Thoroughbred horse racing since Affirmed inor humane euthanasia.
1978? Could it be that the only requirements forAnd frankly, lets stop breeding low quality horses of
breeding a Thoroughbred horse are a papered mareany kind. The Thoroughbred racing industry is not
and money for a stud fee?solely to blame for horse slaughter or unwanted
I imagine, even in 1978, horse breeding and racinghorses altogether. However, Thoroughbred horse
wasn't an incredibly easy or cheap "hobby". Then, notracing is the highest grossing and highest profile entity
every backyard horse owner could afford a.) aof the horse world. For naysayers of horse slaughter,
papered Thoroughbred mare, or b.) a 500 mile haul toThoroughbred racing is an easy target because of its
the stallion. Today, cheap, seedy racetracks aremoney, power, and fan base, but there is no better
numerous and vastly outnumber the celebrity packedtime than to call out an institution on it's dirty little
racing events profiled on T.V. It is perceived as "easy"secrets than when shone national media spotlight (rest
now for anyone to think they can breed the nextassured, if Premarin horses ended up with global
Kentucky Derby winner. For $250, someone can pickcoverage on the Oxygen network, we'd be all over
up a lame and unproven (and possibly even unraced)that too).
Thoroughbred mare and breed her to an equally lame