Disappointed With the Bank Charges Ruling? There's Still Hope

On November 25th Lord Phillips, President of the UKSupreme Court ruled against the Office of Fair Trading
Supreme Court, announced that it is not illegal for(OFT, representing the consumer), Lord Phillips said, 'It
banks to punish customers who go over their agreedmay be open to the Office of Fair Trading to assess
overdraft limit.the charge under other criteria'
The Supreme Court's shock ruling was based on theLord Phillips' comments can be read as a pretty
logic that when a customer opens a bank accounttransparent invitation for OFT to pursue other legal
they agree to the bank's conditions and therefore thearguments in order to secure victory for the consumer.
banks have no case to argue on whether theirArguably the strongest of these arguments is an
charges are 'fair' or not.accusation against the banks of price fixing.
This decision went against two previous rulings by theAll the banks charge their customers roughly the same
High Court and the Court of Appeal and dealt afor unauthorized borrowing, and as these charges
hammer blow to over 1 million UK bank customersbear no relation to any actual cost and can therefore
claiming an average refund of £1500 - a combinedbe deemed as unreasonably high, there may be a
total of £1.7 billion.case to force the banks to refund your charges
UK banks have hit customers with charges totallingbecause collectively they're guilty of price fixing.
£20 billion in the last eight years and some of theYour second chance rests, perhaps more precariously,
most severe punishments include a penalty of £39with the politicians. There are over 1 million UK citizens
for a bounced cheque and a charge of £35 forclaiming unfair bank charges and millions more waiting
going 1p overdrawn.in the wings to do the same; add to this the vast sums
Clydesdale, the costliest high street bank, will chargeof money involved and you have don't just have a
you £25 a month for going overdrawn withoutfinancial issue, you have a red-hot political issue too.
permission plus £25 each time the unplannedWith a general election guaranteed to take place
overdraft increases plus another £35 for everybefore June 3rd next year, don't be surprised if at
bounced payment.least one of the major political parties promises to get
Until Lord Phillips cast his judgement, there had been ayour money back for you - whether or not you
strong feeling that this was a battle in which the smallchoose to believe them of course is another matter.
man held the upper hand. But despite the SupremeCharges like these have given rise to a boom in the
Court's ruling, there is at least a glimmer of hope forpayday loans market as consumers scramble to take
the consumer.out short term loans and check payday loan rates to
If you have a claim on hold and were expecting acover essential financial obligations - many have found
refund in the New Year then all might not be lost. Youtheir debts harder and harder to manage and were
appear to have two chances in one day being reunitedrelying on a back charges refund in the New Year to
with the cash your bank has taken in charges.ease the pressure.
Your first chance lies back in the courts. When the